Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 score. Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older cellphone than the Galaxy A32 5G, but it's thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy S20 features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. Galaxy S20 counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S20 features a much better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.