Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a score of 81.9 against 75. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a incredibly older, just a little thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S8 Active has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Galaxy A32 5G has a better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 5G features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.