Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZs has a score of 77.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 overall score. Sony Xperia XZs's body is thinner and extremely lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released many years before. Xperia XZs features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much higher pixels density.
The Xperia XZs counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. The Xperia XZs captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A32 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low-light environments, a back camera with way less mega pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 72 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.