Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a 78.3 score against 75. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. The vivo X70 Pro is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Galaxy A32 5G, even when both were released with only a few months difference.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a much higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a little larger display.
The vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light images and video, a more mega pixels back facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A32 5G has a bit better battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.