Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, but Xiaomi was able to build it just a bit lighter and a little thinner anyway.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A32 5G counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same resolution back facing camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.