Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max has a general score of 77.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. The Xiaomi Mi Max construction is thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released 5 years before. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy A32 5G takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture. Galaxy A32 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.