Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Even though the Galaxy A32 LTE Only and the vivo X70 Pro were only released 7 months apart, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is way lighter but a little thicker than the vivo X70 Pro. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give you very similar OS features.
Vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a way bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
The vivo X70 Pro features slightly more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit better battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.