Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than LG V20, getting an 84.7 score against 77. The Galaxy A32 design is notably newer than LG V20's, although it is thicker and heavier. The LG V20 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG V20 counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 features a bit superior processor than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores (although slower).
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 56 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.