Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, having an 84.7 score against 83.7. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer cellphone than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it is heavier and just a little thicker.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a much higher pixel density.
Galaxy A32 has just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.