Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 general score. The Galaxy A32 design is newer than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's, but it's a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A8 Star counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
Galaxy A8 Star counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A8 Star also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a better display density.
Galaxy A32 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.