Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Xperia XZ3's overall score of 79.6. Even though the Galaxy A32 is a little heavier than the Xperia XZ3, it's just a little thinner and also notably newer. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a lot higher screen density. The Galaxy A32 features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xperia XZ3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A32 features a bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video and a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.