Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while vivo X60 Pro comes with Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a thicker and heavier device than vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a quite larger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a higher pixel density.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has better video frame rate.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 has better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.