Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32, getting an 85.5 score against 84.7. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older than the Galaxy A32, it's body is lighter and a little thinner. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A32 captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.