| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, offering some extra features. The Galaxy A35 5G body is noticeably newer than vivo X70 Pro's, although it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Vivo X70 Pro has a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit worse screen density, they both have a same size display.
Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Vivo X70 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.