Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-30 |
| -- | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has an overall score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35's general score of 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X70 Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy A35 has Android 14. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy A35, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A35, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a just a little lower display pixels density, they both have a display of the same size. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A35, because it has a back facing camera with more MP. Galaxy A35 features just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.