Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a 79.6 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy A40 is an a lot older and just a little thicker device than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A40 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Galaxy A40 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A40 features a better memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.