Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 has an overall score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. The Galaxy A40 is a noticeably newer and lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's just a little bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A40 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit greater pixels amount per screen inch. The Motorola Moto Z Force features just a little better performance than Galaxy A40, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Motorola Moto Z Force shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way more MP back facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.