Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A40, getting a global score of 80 against 79.6. Despite being the best phone in this review, Motorola One Zoom is a way heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A40. The Galaxy A40 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A40 also counts with a just a little higher display density.
The Motorola One Zoom features a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A40, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 384 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola One Zoom has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A40. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One Zoom has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3100mAh. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much higher (4K) video definition, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.