Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than Galaxy A40, having an 87 score against 79.6. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than Galaxy A40, but it's noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy A40 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A40 features just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos, a way higher (4K) video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.