Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 437 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a general score of 79.6 against 79.2. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A40 has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy A40 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A40 has a lot better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better video definition and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.