Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the Galaxy A40, having a score of 93.4 against 79.6. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Galaxy A40 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a notably newer and a little thinner device than the Galaxy A40, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A40 features a better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.