Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 437 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A40's global score of 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer than Samsung Galaxy A40's, but it is heavier and extremely thicker. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy A40 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A40 also counts with a little higher screen density. Galaxy XCover Pro's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A40 one, both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and equal internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A40. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.7 aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.