Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A40, with a general score of 87.9 against 79.6. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than Samsung Galaxy A40, it's somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A40 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and a way higher video quality.
The Galaxy A40 counts with a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.