Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy A41 design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
Galaxy A41 and Google Pixel 3a have extremely similar processors, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Google Pixel 3a features a display that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A41, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A41 shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.