Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, having a global score of 81.7 against 81.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A41 has a newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A41 construction is incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even when both were released only 7 months apart.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a little better performance than Galaxy A41. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM. Galaxy A41 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A41 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G 5G has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.