Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is better than Galaxy A41's 81.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer and just a little thinner phone than Galaxy A41, but it's also just a little bit heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11, so it offers some extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, although it has a little bit worse pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a screen with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy S22 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A41, because it has a back-facing camera with a better resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.