Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 has a global score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy A41's design has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it's lighter. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A41 features a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch. The vivo X70 Pro features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations, higher video frame rate, a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a more mega-pixels back camera.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.