Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's general score of 77.1. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A41 has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Galaxy A41 features an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a quite larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A41, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.