Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A42's general score of 87. Apple iPhone X's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A42, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone X has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A42, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixel amount per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Galaxy A42 features a bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Apple iPhone X has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A42, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Galaxy A42 captures a bit better videos and photos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A42 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A42 features a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.