Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A42 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, with an 87 score against 81.9. Galaxy A42's design is newer than Google Pixel 4's, although it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Google Pixel 4 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A42, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better count of pixels per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Galaxy A42 has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A42, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A42 counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% greater battery size. Galaxy A42 captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A42 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.