Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A42's overall score of 87. Although the LG Wing is a better phone than Samsung Galaxy A42, we must tell that it's also a thicker and extremely heavier phone. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A42 has Android 11 version.
The LG Wing features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A42, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG Wing has a sharper screen than Galaxy A42, because it has a higher display density, a bit bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The LG Wing counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A42, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG Wing counts with a better camera than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has higher video frame rates and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with greater battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.