| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy A42 is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a score of 87 against 76.4. Although the Galaxy A42 is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Galaxy A42 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A42 also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a more vivid display than Galaxy A42, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better count of pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A42 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A42 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A42 also has a camera in the back with a way higher 48 MP resolution. Samsung Galaxy A42 features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.