Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A42 is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 87 score against 80.7. The Galaxy A42 construction has the same thickness than the Motorola One Vision, but it's a bit heavier. The Motorola One Vision features a better looking screen than Galaxy A42, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a way better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola One Vision features a processing unit that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A42 one, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A42 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Vision takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.