Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A42's 87 global score. The Motorola razr (2020) is a a little lighter and a bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A42, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A42, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A42, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A42 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.