Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 266 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A42 is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 87 against 79.2. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A42 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy A42 has a much better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A42, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A42, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.