Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a 98 score against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s, but it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a just a bit better pixels density, a lot bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a way better video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 112 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.