Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-08 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is better than Galaxy A5 (2016), getting an 82.6 score against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and incredibly lighter device than Galaxy A5 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) features a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations, a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy S25 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.