Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a overall score of 78.3 against 71.9. The vivo X70 Pro is a much newer device than the Galaxy A5 (2016), but it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376.
The vivo X70 Pro has a superior performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much higher 50 MP resolution camera. Vivo X70 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 53% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.