Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than Galaxy A5 (2016), having a global score of 84.3 against 71.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 design is much newer and thinner, but way heavier than Galaxy A5 (2016). The Galaxy A5 (2016) has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a way better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.