Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-08 | 2019-02-07 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| 64-bit (Single-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G7 has a score of 75.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2016)'s global score of 68.7. Although the Motorola Moto G7 is extremely newer than the Galaxy A5 (2016), it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Galaxy A5 (2016) features a much better display than Moto G7, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density.
Moto G7 counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Moto G7 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto G7 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. Motorola Moto G7 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Moto G7 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.