Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger display, a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way bigger aperture. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 45 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.