Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a global score of 78.3 against 75.8. Vivo X70 Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but they have the same thickness. The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A5 (2017) count with extremely similar displays, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way better 50 MP resolution camera. Vivo X70 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 48 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.