Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy A5
SM-A500, SM-A500F, SM-A500K, SM-A500H, SM-A500L, SM-A500HQ| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-30 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.48 x 2.74 x 0.26 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminium | -- |
| $ 239.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A5, having a general score of 77.8 against 72.4. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and Galaxy A5 has Android 4.4.4 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Galaxy A5, but it is noticeably heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Galaxy A5, because it has a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a really larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A5 counts with a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics co-processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A5, because it has a way better resolution camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A5. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A5, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.