Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 335.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note Edge's global score of 81.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a much newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy Note Edge. Galaxy Note Edge has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Galaxy Note Edge features a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a way bigger aperture and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy A50 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.