Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is much older than vivo X70 Pro, it's body is just a bit thinner and a little lighter. Vivo X70 Pro has a screen that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size. The vivo X70 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much higher resolution back camera, a much larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.