Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A50s, with a global score of 93.3 against 86.6. The iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A50s has Android 10 operating system. IPhone 13 Pro is a somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A50s, but both of them have the same thickness.
IPhone 13 Pro has a better processing power than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processor. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.