Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50s, getting a 93.2 score against 86.6. IPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A50s has Android 10 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body has the same thickness than Galaxy A50s, but it's way heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch of screen, a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy A50s features a much greater storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 9 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots much better pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.