Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A50s, getting an 88.1 score against 86.6. The iPhone X construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A50s, but it's just a little bit heavier. Apple iPhone X has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPhone X has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A50s, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A50s counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.