Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, having a global score of 86.6 against 80. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Google Pixel 3, but it's also somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s and the Google Pixel 3 feature similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 3 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A50s shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.