Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 score. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer phone, and it is also a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL features a processing unit that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A50s's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.